Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07
They got it wrong, I don't know why, and don't quickly jump to conspiracy theories ... they way you quickly do when the stamps have a bad call against them. However its perfectly clear that he did not touch the ground.
You realize it was the last play of the game right? You think it's a forgone conclusion that ND would have won either way? Do you even watch football? or just randomly reply to things on here?
And that would be wrong. He was still moving and fighting for yards. yes his momentum stopped but he wasn't in anyones grasp, proved by the fact that he kept working his way into the end zone. If the whistle blew dead the instant someone stopped moving forward every second play would look materially different. Its common for momentum to stop very quickly only to be regained again before going down.
|
I only talk conspiracy theory with Stamps and every other CFL team with the Priders, not close to with any bad call that goes against them.
Of course it wasn't a foregone conclusion that ND would have won but the way Stanford was playing it didn't look likely that their offender was going to do much.
To me it looked like ND stopped, which was wrong by them, because they saw his forward momentum was stopped. Not the right move by them but it doesn't change that forward progress was stopped and most times that is blown dead.
Good to see the garbage "do you even watch" BS is brought out by you.