Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F
The whole "lots of other variables" argument doesn't hold water. Give a good pool of examples those types of variables statistically wash out.
As for one year to the next, it's easy enough to compare development curves of NCAA to CHL players vs. pure CHL players.
If the NCAA is second rate, it should be document-able given that players have switched over the years.
|
Its documented by the much better and more players the CHL produces. N
Not sure why a few players who switched and may or may not have had a better year with another year of development on a completely different team would change the fact that the best players come from the CHL and the majority of NA players are developed in the CHL.