Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
well duh!!
of course it is moral relativism, my point is it is equally relative to go after Armstrong, we know full well the whole sport was lousy so why screw one guy because he happens to be famous? at this point the whole sport needs to be given an asterisk
And incidently even after Festina the sports administrators didn't really try to clean things up, to be frank if there was no Lance Armstrong and the US had continued to ignore cycling I doubt the sport would have changed at all.
|
oh, so civil discussion is out the window is it?!
Your arguments are patently ridiculous, the notion that there is a conspiracy against Lance is laughable at best and truly pathetic at worst.
Any other cyclist would have been pursued just as vigorously if they happened to be successful at the same time as Lance.
People like you are the ones that legitimize athletes taking drugs and cheating, explaining it away and poo pooing those that actually, you know don't have a sliding scale about right and wrong.
Sorry, your "hero" was a cheat and a fraud - glad that he's getting called out.
now go cry, wearing your Liestrong wrist band, at your altar of Lance Armstrong, a proven cheater on the scale of Marion Jones and the Balco/Festina fiascos....
you lose