[QUOTE=Azure;3891716]Outside of the 'testimonies' from the other riders, the other 'evidence' the USADA is pretty weak.
They say he avoided the tests, which sounds completely absurd. Wasn't the most tested athlete ever? I mean either the testing protocal was properly adhered too, or it wasn't. How can he avoid tests?
Really? That is the best they can come up with? He didn't answer the door when the testers came? Why wasn't here reported?
Again, this screams of incompetence by whoever was in charge of the testing. Did Lance retire there? Pretty sure he lived and trained in Texas during the off season. Sounds like a lame excuse.
Then they claim he took undetectable drugs. Well, maybe he did, and maybe he didn't, but there is nothing but hearsay to say that he did. Last time I checked that didn't count as evidence in any first world country. Oh right, this is the USADA we are talking about.
QUOTE]
The Canadians working for a large Australian company in Australia did all of the above to avoid drug tests. The people in charge of drug testing performed drug testing on Australian athletes for the olympics, so they were the best the country has to offer.
Not a single Canadian ever tested positive...and I know the real circumstances not to be true.
Drug testing/worrying about drug testing takes up less than 0.01% of my life and we figured out a system to beat it; I believe all the allegations are true against Lance. Proving it beyond a resonable doubt I guess is a bit grey for some folks, but not this guy.
Liestrong. Ha.
|