View Single Post
Old 10-05-2012, 10:29 AM   #8
undercoverbrother
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sylvan Lake
Exp:
Default

this is a better story, more info.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...rticle4591389/


Quote:
Specifically, today's decisions said that in order to obtain a conviction for aggravated sexual assault, the Crown must show that an accused person failed to disclose his or her HIV status despite there being "a realistic possibility" of transmission.
Quote:
Richard Elliott, executive director of the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, said his coalition was "dismayed and shocked by the Supreme Court’s decision.
"It is a step backward for public health and for human rights," Mr. Elliott said. "The Supreme Court has ignored the solid science and has opened the door to convictions for non-disclosure even where the risk of transmission is negligible – in the realm of 1 in 100,000."
__________________
Captain James P. DeCOSTE, CD, 18 Sep 1993

Corporal Jean-Marc H. BECHARD, 6 Aug 1993
undercoverbrother is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to undercoverbrother For This Useful Post: