Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
It doesn't require a study. It requires someone, say the PM with the majority, to go 'Look. Abortion isn't great. But it is a necessary evil; look at the places with restrictive/illegal abortion policies, and tell me which of them you'd like to live in. The answer is none of them. So here's the deal. No abortions after the 2nd trimester. If you don't want the kid, we have institutions in place to help find the baby a good home. But a late-term abortion is probably going to be VERY hard for you to come back from, and you may never be the same person. So please, make the decision early, or let us help a loving family have a child".
It seems like a pipe dream that anyone would ever be that reasonable, however.
|
I agree with you here that it would be better done by the pm but that would be political sucide even this back bencher study vote certainly is hurting the conservative image. All because people cant grow up and have a rational discussion on abortion.
For me no abortions after a fetus is viable would be a reasonable point to draw the line.