Quote:
Originally Posted by HELPNEEDED
Thats a pretty impressive list of regulations etc., however, dog hair is much worse then most other "contaminats" that can make it to my food.
previous to this change in regulation for ranchmans, dogs were not allowed in places that sold food.
Besides your use of the word enterprise, you show that you do not understand the scope of business and health regulations. Again, the city farewell knows that if it gets enough complaints of your dogs fur in other patrons food they will shutdown ranchman's license to allow dogs, its really that simple. This is a pilot project with the intent of showing that this will not work.
Not sure if serious, I have a dog, cleaned twice a week, she in all hell knows she is not allowed in the kitche/dining area, that is absolutley off limits. Dogs are inherently dirty animals, they lick their own asses. It is a health risk as defined by health Canada.
Federal laws and regulations override all provincial legislature, so if health Canada heard complaints about Ranchman's I'll bet anything that this pilot program will be shutdown.
I cannot fathom what filth you live in, when in your world dogs fur is ok in food. You must love pubes in food.
Its not an acceptable risk for me, and I could like ranchman's. I do not want your belief in your right to bring your dog there to infringe on my right to enjoy a meal on that patio at ranchmans.
*I have not been to ranchman's since i was 18, that was 10 years ago.
|
This post is full of all sorts of idiocy, but I really want to pinpoint this bit. Use of the word enterprise? Really?
Btw, you have absolutely no right to enjoy a meal on a patio at Ranchman's. None.