Quote:
Originally Posted by etherealgirl
Politics isn't black and white, face value, and it's not an elaborate conspiracy theory either. I'm not sure how assuming that the leader of a party with a very firm grip on control who I imagine (personally) shares Woodworth's beliefs and also counts the religious right in his base is not at all involved in any capacity or happy with the end result is "out to lunch". It's not deserving of an eye-roll either.
|
For someone who says it isn't black and white, you sure think it's black and white that this vote was all Harper's sinister evil agenda with no hard facts that he had anything to do with the motion being brought forward by a private member. The only fact you have is that he voted no.
And you're right, it isn't black and white, but making assumption with no fact is useless to the debate entirely. I mean, why would we ever let the facts get in the way of some great emotions?