Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

M*A*S*H 4077 · 09-23-2012, 02:29 PM

Only possible thing is they must have decided that he had possession while the ball was against his leg when he was on the ground?

CFL should have to release a statement explaining each ruling after the game.

Riders O looks decent though

09-23-2012, 02:29 PM	#15
MAS*H 4077 Franchise Player Join Date: Jan 2011 Exp:	Only possible thing is they must have decided that he had possession while the ball was against his leg when he was on the ground? CFL should have to release a statement explaining each ruling after the game. Riders O looks decent though