View Single Post
Old 09-22-2012, 06:40 PM   #41
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by krazycanuck View Post
I think a Edmonton to Calgary train is very much feasable. The QE2 is nearing the point where it is going to need to be expanded to 6 lanes between Calgary and Edmonton, that is not going to be a cheap upgrade. A high speed rail line would delay the need for that.

At the very least you could reasonably say that a majority of those using air travel or bus (Greyhound and Red Arrow) between Calgary and Edmonton would opt for high speed rail.
The Oliver-Wyman report (see figure 8.17 on page 113 by Adobe or 104 by printed page numbers) puts the expected market share of HSR at 2-7% (depending on the speed, faster = higher market share). Air, Greyhound, and Red arrow are less than 2% each and would decrease with HSR.

HSR would put a dent into vehicle traffic on the QE2, but it isn't much of a solution compared to that Autobahn we all want.

===============

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
For a country the size of Canada, our rail system is appallingly bad.

Not talking high speed, but rail in general.
Odd comment. The bigger the country, the more you'd expect air to substitute for rail.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote