Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf
After the whole season I don't think Dan comes close to Will
you can't compare them to people who have played twice because you come in at a disadvantage, Will basically played the same game twice, Dan couldn't at all and played a game he had no chance to win
|
Why? The guy came into the game with what should have been the largest target on his back and ended up with 0 eviction votes...again.
Jury management is part of the game and he did mess up there. But to get to that stage you need to actually survive until the jury and at least in his second season he got there. His play obviously wasn't perfect or else he would have won but at the same time when someone like Jenn is voting for Ian because Dan's already won that's not really something you can fault on him. And I don't know if I would really fault him for Frank either, Frank was just a bitter baby voter and for a "superfan" that's really disappointing. I think Britney was on the fence, so really his biggest mistake was how Shane's eviction occurred where he completely lost any chance for that vote. Sometimes in games like poker there's just no way of winning a hand regardless how much better you are.
Anyways, anyone who can have BOTH his opponents tank in a final HoH competition is at least on par with Will in my opinion.