Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
It's not a twist. Your aiming the protection of the law at the exact opposite group the law was designed to protect.
Public safety concerns are an entirely different thing and this would potentially be covered by the much more draconian anti-terrorism laws, but this speech in no way fits the definition of "hate speech" in the USA.
|
Thanks, which would be why I said that calling it hate speech previously was incorrect.