Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike F
You've totally missed the point.
No one wearing a short skirt in public should reasonably expect people to take pictures up their skirt, therefore a women who had that done could reasonably claim to be shocked.
To restate my point: If the known and expected outcome of an act is X, don't engage in the act then complain when X occurs.
|
I am going to guess that she didn't expect for someone to be parked a half mile away with what amount to a telescope on a camera ready to take a shot based upon the reaction of the royal family. At the end of the day you are holding someone to a completely different standard because she is famous. It isn't up to you to decide who should be shocked and at what occurrence, especially if someone was in a private residence at the time. This is just a story about sleezeball photographer being a sleezeball and an equally sleezy magazine publishing the photographs.
It was a situation where she has a reasonable expectation as a person not to be photographed, if she was in a public area, then snap away... on a balcony at a private estate from a half mile away... something doesn't sit right with me.