Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeBass
So the rule is that all famous women have no right to privacy cause they choose to be famous.
This is a person who has done nothing but cut ribbons at hospitals and visit kids that are dying.
Do you have any idea what this will do to her? She has been marginalized to a pair of t--ts in a paper? No matter what she does these pics will come up. So the price of being a princess is a loss of dignity...nice.
|
The cost of becoming wife of the future King of England is a loss of personal privacy. This has been a well known fact since well before Ms. Middleton was born, so if she wasn't prepared to accept that her private life was going to become public interest, she should have married a school teacher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeBass
Are there other situations I don't know about when it is ok to degrade a women? A short skirt means ok to hit on?, a hooker can be raped?
There must be a line that you have that says it's ok, just where does it start? Does it start at fame then?
Its not the fact that somebody took those pictures that is disgusting its that somebody paid for them.
|
Oh, give me a F***ing break. Being photographed when you chose to go topless is equivalent to rape?
As for the short skirt analogy, I'd say that any attractive woman who chooses to wear a short skirt to a night club can expect to be hit on. Therefore, if you are a woman who doesn't feel like being hit on, don't go to a night club, or dress more modestly.
Edit: The line is, if the known and expected outcome of engaging in a given act is X, don't engage in that act and then become offended when X occurs.