View Single Post
Old 09-15-2012, 12:16 AM   #12
Ryan Coke
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042 View Post
Good time to ask that question- have domestic Canadian flights always flown that high? I could have swore that in the late 80s and early 90s on flights between Winnipeg and Calgary they announced our cruising altitude as ~25,000 feet. And yes, that would have been on a 737 or similar DC jet; not some turbo prop plane.
A DC-9 or 737-200 would've been in the 30-35000' range still, so I can't see why you would be at 25000' on a flight of that length. Newer Jets like the 737NG will tend to be a bit higher, like 37000-41000, due to better engine and wing performance, and being higher results in better fuel efficiency.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Inglewood Jack View Post
so looks like the death line is around 23,000ft (for imperialists out there). even a relatively short flight from what I've experienced tends to go significantly above that, nevermind the sub-antarctic temperatures. do 1/4th of all stowaways have the latest mountaineering gear and training, and are lugging a giant oxygen tank?

there must be something a bit different about that landing gear space, compared to the conditions outside the plane. maybe it's slightly more pressurized somehow?
Nothing different from a pressurization perspective. I could see maybe if you found a spot by a hydraulic pump or lines that might give you a bit of heat, but I would be surprised if it could do much to avoid hypothermia and death.

That is why I am curious about the numbers, and how many of the survivors have occurred on modern type jets.The combination of altitude and temperature in the high 30000's would make survival pretty remarkable.
Ryan Coke is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ryan Coke For This Useful Post: