Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Do you at least admit that IF the riding had gone PC, the chances of them kiboshing a project they had already promised and sunk millions of dollars into, would be less than...well....zero?
|
I'm not defending why the PC's did this, or how it came about. I do think that this was the right decision though. To me its a gray area in that sense; they might not have arrived there in the best way, but one way or another they came to the right decision.
Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
My position?
I think braid had it bang on in the editorial. It's a bit ridiculous to Claim fiscal prudence on a project they had in the budget, promised for years and even went so far to sign contracts two months ago. It has much more to do with politics.
|
So can we assume that your position is that because the Wildrose never said they would cut this, that you would rather see this built? Pretty clearly the Wildrose didn't claim they would cut this as they did with the Art Museum, so it wasn't on the chopping block. Right now it would likely be full speed ahead with this project?