Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Sure... but why weren't the chiefs saying this in February? Last year? Two years ago? Three years ago? Four years ago? Five years ago? Six years ago? And if they were, why wasn't the government listening?
C'mon Slava, even you have to admit the timing stinks to high hell.
Adding sources of income does not solve the root issue, which is how the government spends money like an 18-year-old who just got back from working three months in Fort McMurray.
But then, I might be too harsh. It seems the government is showing signs of learning how to control its runaway spending. But only in ridings that aren't blue.
|
The timing is questionable, absolutely. I just don't get the impression that the Wildrose would've actually canceled this sooner? Have they ever raised it as something that they would cut?
This leads back to my favorite criticism of the Wildrose though. They accuse the government of spending like drunken sailors, and that's fine. Have they finally found the stones to tell us where they would cut? I looked at what they produced during the campaign and that amateur hour production wasn't going to balance the books.