Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji
Well the OP and thread topic, and the majority of the article were discussing his arrest, which was for violation of the wiretapping law. I am sure his allegations about the assault are likely well founded, hut the fact that he broke the law to prove it, seemed to overshadow that
As for the naming of the law, or having that law cover both tapping yours or another persons phone to record conversations without them being aware, I am not sure why t here is an issue. The 2 things are identical in many ways.
|
And that's the unfortunate part. I think the end totally justifies the means in this case and I can't believe that this guy is actually getting into trouble for outing these pieces of trash (am I allowed to call a cop a piece of trash if he beat up a kid?).