Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
He wasn't standing against anyone rights.
|
When the issue is "These people over here don't have the same rights as those people over there" and you come out as opposed to the end-goal of leveling that playing field, that is EXACTLY what you are doing. How you've convinced yourself otherwise is beyond me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
If homosexuals have a "right" to marry then they could go to court and demand it. The fact is they don't have that right so instead they stage a pathetic attempt at a kiss-in at some chicken joints.
|
As opposed to the pathetic display by the evangelicals at some chicken joints? I thought you just said that the big 'kiss-in' never really happened?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
What the few that showed up for the kiss-in were doing was protesting free speech.
|
Please explain how they have attempted to protest free speech. No one has demanded that Dan Cathy be muzzled. He's voiced an opinion, and we can either agree with it or disagree with it. People vocally and publicly disagreeing with his idiotic opinion is not an attempt to stifle free speech, it IS free speech.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgaryborn
You on the other hand are homophobic. You fear to stand against the homosexual political agenda.
|
... or, y'know, Rouge isn't a bigot and thus has no need to oppose the 'homosexual political agenda'. (lolwut?)