Quote:
Originally Posted by vektor
that's not the point, it's about one person in a free society having the right to do something while another person has those same rights revoked because of biological and genetic differences. The argument that a society needs to protect marriage to save our reproductive rate is beyond absurd, in the realm of absolute delusion and lunacy.
If 1% of the population is genetically homosexual restricting their personal freedoms effects reproduction rates how exactly? If anything reproduction rates need to slow down as the exponential growth curve of the population will soon exceed the finite resources the earth can provide. I just don't understand how you can say what you did... it's a sentence from a magical world where you don't think logically. I'd like to know how not giving 2 gay men a piece of paper that is legally binding will help women become impregnated.
|
You misunderstood completely.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|