Quote:
Originally Posted by morgin
No, there aren't. Not any that have been able to demonstrate this scientifically and that doing nothing would have had a worse effect than the natural means.
If you are suggesting that improving ones diet can contribute to improving health, that's cool. Pretty sure no one will dispute that. Not going to cure your cancer by drinking carrot shakes instead of eating big macs, but you might get your body into better shape to prolong the fight. If you're saying there are doctors who have proven that "natural" treatments have demonstrated the ability to slow or destroy cancer cells as well as or better than current "accepted" treatment methods, no, there aren't.
|
Thank you for your input. Even though it is clearly spoken from an ignorant place. The Pulmonary surgeon in forks over knives clearly points out the development of cancer and it's reduction in a controlled environment. There is a clinical Dr and a Research Dr that found the same answers before they even met. It's remarkable and completely stupid that you would argue without learning about it first.
Furthermore, I don't care what you think, or anyone else. There are already doctors out there healing chronic disease with their prescriptions including cancer. The difference is what we believe a prescription is.
dichloroacetate is a chemical that has been found to destroy cancer cells.
However, I agree, believing in something without proof is certainly questionable.