View Single Post
Old 07-23-2012, 11:54 AM   #389
JayP
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies View Post
I guess the NCAA agreed with those of us who thought that the football program should be harshly punished for the actions of the individuals involved, and not those who argued that the crimes had nothing to do with the program. Good.
What's good about it? Does banning Penn St. players from playing in bowl games and being competitive provide any justice or solace to the people affected by Sandusky & the cover-up?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Penn St. cleaned house of everyone remotely involved with the cover-up? What exactly does killing the football program for their replacements achieve?

I agree with the fines, but killing the football program isn't any measure of justice on anyone who's in the wrong - it's a symbolic action that shifts the focus on football instead of the real criminals.
JayP is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JayP For This Useful Post: