View Single Post
Old 07-23-2012, 11:25 AM   #516
SeeBass
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
You know, I don't get this. If someone breaks into your home and wants to harm your children, why wouldn't you want an assault rifle for protection?

Just pointing it at the would be intruder would likely scare him off.

And anyone who thinks home invasion don't happen is seriously naive.

I find it pretty stupid that people want to prohibit others from protecting their own home.
That is a fair reason.

I would assume you will not allow somebody to have a bazzoka or a tank for protection.
So there probably is a limit to what is acceptable for protection.

So in your view an AR falls into the ok list. Where, in your opinion, is the acceptable limit on what weapon a person can have?
SeeBass is offline   Reply With Quote