Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
No, he was found to be simply repeating a racist phrase that someone accused him of having said or some such BS.
He may have said the words, but he was only repeating what 'someone' else said, but accused him of saying.
|
I can understand why he can be found not guilty in court because it can't be proven beyond reasonable doubt. However, I still think there is enough evidence for the FA to take action and suspend him for a few games.
A comment on another site:
Quote:
|
Both Terry and Suarez admit to using words which in a certain context can be considered racist. Both Terry and Suarez claim that the context in which those words were used were not racist. Both have a fair point and without any witnesses who can verify the context in which those words were used by both men, they would both be found not guilty in a court of law.
|
It's unlikely either man would be found guilty in court, but at this point I'm failing to see a valid explanation as to why Terry should avoid punishment from the FA (and tbf, it is not certain that he will avoid punishment as of yet).