06-26-2012, 05:13 PM
			
			
		 | 
		
			 
			#2
			
		 | 
	
	| 
			
			 Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer 
			
			
			
				
			
			
				 
				Join Date: Oct 2002 
				Location: Crowsnest Pass 
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				     
			 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/...gs-considered/
I’ve been teaching college students about the economics of the music  business at the University of Georgia for the last two years.  Unfortunately for artists, most of them share your attitude about  purchasing music. There is a disconnect between their personal behavior  and a greater social injustice that is occurring. You seem to have  internalized that ripping 11,000 tracks in your iPod compared to your  purchase of 15 CDs in your lifetime feels pretty disproportionate. You  also seem to recognize that you are not just ripping off the record  labels but you are directly ripping off the artist and songwriters whose  music you “don’t buy”. It doesn’t really matter that you didn’t take  these tracks from a file-sharing site. That may seem like a neat dodge,  but I’d suggest to you that from the artist’s point of view, it’s kind  of irrelevant. 
 
The average income of a musician that files taxes is something like 35k a  year w/o benefits. The vast majority of artists do not make significant  money on the road. Until recently, most touring activity was a money  losing operation. The idea was the artists would make up the loss  through recorded music sales. This has been reversed by the financial  logic of file-sharing and streaming. You now tour to support making  albums if you are very, very lucky. Otherwise, you pay for making albums  out of your own pocket. Only the very top tier of musicians make ANY  money on the road. And only the 1% of the 1% makes significant money on the road. (For now.) 
 
On a personal level, I have witnessed the impoverishment of many  critically acclaimed but marginally commercial artists. In particular,  two dear friends: Mark Linkous (Sparklehorse) and Vic Chesnutt. Both of  these artists, despite growing global popularity, saw their total   incomes fall in the last decade. There is no other explanation except  for the fact that “fans” made the unethical choice to take their music  without compensating these artists.
 Shortly before Christmas 2009, Vic took his life. He was my neighbor,  and I was there as they put him in the ambulance. On March 6th, 2010,  Mark Linkous shot himself in the heart. Anybody who knew either of these  musicians will tell you that the pair suffered depression. They will  also tell you their situation was worsened by their financial situation. 
 
What the corporate backed Free Culture movement is asking us to do is  analogous to changing our morality and principles to allow the  equivalent of looting. 
 
Ultimately there are three “inconvenient” things that MUST happen for any legal service:
 1.create an account and provide a payment method (once)
 2.enter your password.
 3. Pay for music.
 So what you are really saying is that you won’t do these three  things. This is too inconvenient.  And I would guess that the most  inconvenient part is….step 3.
 That’s fine. But then you must live with the moral and ethical choice  that you are making to not pay artists. And artists won’t be paid. And  it won’t be the fault of some far away evil corporation. You “and your  peers” ultimately bear this responsibility.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				  
				
					
						Last edited by troutman; 06-26-2012 at 05:19 PM.
					
					
				
			
		
		
	 | 
	
		
 
		
		
		
		
		 
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 |