Quote:
Originally Posted by JayP
How is one any different than the other?
Most of the alleged baseless negativity is in regards to not picking certain guys at #14 as opposed to disliking the pick at #21. There was more proven high ceiling guys available, but we chose an extra second rounder over them. Was it worth it? That's a perfectly valid argument, IMO, and one that shouldn't be brushed over in favor of the baseless positivity that apparently constitutes good discussion.
|
I don't mind a healthy debate about the decision, but there are some posters who haven't seen the player, or even heard of him, yet are writing it off.
I will always have more patience for positivity than negativity. I think it is a healthier way to approach things.
When the same people whine all the time - it gets tiresome.