^^^
You and Sliver are missing the point.
If he had been far less alarmist, not given the thread a ridiculous title, and based on NuclearPizzaMan's latest contribution, not overstated the stats at all, then yes sure, we could have a regular discussion. If he had made a reasoned argument with a possibility of at least pretending at looking at both sides maybe it would have picked up discussion.
But ridiculous threads will get ridiculous responses. Has nothing to do with cats v dogs as you put it.
|