Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I'm not fracking talking about tabacco smoke, and it has nothing to do with this debate to be honest.
ITs the whole idea of we should legalize this drug because cigarettes are legal its a stupid argument you don't keep legalizing potentially dangerous drungs because one is already legal.
I clould put up a chart saying that we can legalize handguns because they kill less people then tabacco.
There are also far less users of Ecstacy then there are smokes.
|
Comprehension not your string suit, eh? Graph is deaths per 100 users, not total deaths period.
It's related to the debate because it makes no "fracking" sense to argue against legalizing one substance that's proven to be less harmful than many currently legal substances.
You said it. Keep it illegal because kids won't follow the rules, but backed up your argument by showing the they're already abusing a legal drug in vodka & red bull. Both are potentially fatal if abused, neither are a problem if used responsibly. What's the difference, apart from currently legal vs currently illegal?
Beyond that. How are you planning to go about making everything dangerous illegal?