Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartcar
Didn't say it to hijack this thread but since you mention it, yes they likely do, but not because the NY Times prints their very distinctive mug with their columns. Not to mention videos like the one initially posted. They "try" to be anonymous, so that their experiences and opinions are more relevant to what the average diner can expect.
|
So basically you're emplying that the average joe/ unwashed masses are served one type of food while restaurant critics get the good stuff (I assume they keep it in the back) thus the need for restaurant critic annomymity, thereby not allowing the restaurant to hoodwink said critic by serving him the good stuff and all the time he thinks that this is what EVERYONE gets to eat.
.... hmmm... those sneaky little buggers. Who knew?
Well thats it! Next time I go out to a restaurant I'm going to DEMAND I be served the good stuff that they save for restaurant critics, like Mr Gilchrist.