Quote:
Originally Posted by Five-hole
That's not my problem -- pick a different business model.
|
As much as I agree with Fotze about how evil Impark is- this statement is what bothers me.
What you are saying is that because you refuse to pay, their paying customers should have to pay more so that the lot can be fenced off and have either an attendant or some other form metered entry/exit? All to prevent you from taking something that doesn't belong to you? Sure- it may be something less tangible than a TV; but it is something that has a value.
Where do you draw the line? Should you be allowed to stay in a hotel room for free if the hotel isn't full? What about flying on a plane that has seats leftover?