Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Obvious
So your point in all of this is that if they'd supported him there would have been newspaper stories on how a company allowed an employee to keep his hair pink to support a good cause?
Seriously?
|
One of my points was that they could have gone to the media with a story of what an emplyee is doing. Employee gets to keep his hair pink for a few days and people won't get scared of his pink hair.
My other point was pointing out that people wouldn't be offended by his pink hair as many would understand why he is doing it.
Further more, I don't care what the color of anyones hair is, just as long as the service is good. I'd be concerned if someone hadn't shaved, taken a bath or dressed like a slob.
Quote:
No outlet runs any kind of story on that.
|
Outlets run human interest stories all the time where people do good things.
Quote:
The only reason there's a story on their decision to disallow him is because it creates controversy. No controversy, no story.
|
It's the Sun Media were talking about here. The Canadian version of the American Fox media. Thought that would be kind of obvious
Quote:
Really thought that would be kind of obvious.
|
Forgive me for having a difference of an opinion than you on the issue. I'll rmember to toe the line next time and follow your policy