Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacks
|
To be fair, they're not, they're filing affidavits to support applications for warrants. It's the press that's reporting the filings, which are public. Once they get the warrants and the information it may not support the theory used to support the warrant.
Anyway all the article says is the IP wasn't the campaign office IP, not that it didn't belong to someone related to the campaign.