Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
That's about the only one that holds up.
The Guy Fawkes mask argument would get you in the door, but you'd still have to demonstrate that the mask was actually part of the expression and not just a means to hide your face while commuting a crime.
It's very easy to say 'oh that violates x clause of the Charter'. It's much more difficult to make an argument thatactually succeeds.
|
You speak like you dictate the law knowing precisely what would and wouldn't hold up. I'm simply saying there's a chance and certain cases where The Charter can protect against these charges.
Don't come in here saying my opinion is right or wrong. The law isn't black and white.