Quote:
Originally Posted by VO #23
Just saw this one after I was posted the other message - the onus would actually be on the government to justify the infringement. It's pretty clear that a number of Charter rights are engaged on their face.
|
I don't see the clear infringement, although to be fair I haven't read the actual Bill. I think you'd still have a hill to climb in most cases to show an infringement. Remember who this is aimed at, not people assembling and wearing those giant paper mache heads of state masks, but rather people covering their faces while engaging in a riot. I don't see how you have a right under the Charter to hide your face while engaging in a criminal act.