View Single Post
Old 05-09-2012, 11:54 AM   #91
calgaryrocks
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper View Post
So, are men who are submissive in heterosexual relationships "less manly" by your 2,000 year old view?
I was just joking. there is no need for people to measure their manliness (although many do). the term macho is silly, what does it even mean?
and "less manly" than who? people have thier sexual preferences, which is fine, none of my business. I still don't think it is what God intended, but I don't think it's right to restrict others freedoms. what is my 2000 year old view exactly?
edit: if you want to measure manliness, I guess being overly submissive in a relationship is less manly (hetero or homo). but what is submissive? not always getting your way/what you want? well I don't think that is a healthy relationship, but never standing up for yourself or what you want or being the leader in the relationship, that is probably less manly
__________________
GO FLAMES, STAMPEDERS, ROUGHNECKS, CALVARY, DAWGS and SURGE!

Last edited by calgaryrocks; 05-09-2012 at 11:57 AM.
calgaryrocks is offline   Reply With Quote