Quote:
Originally Posted by Notorious Honey Badger
My question, not argument, is when is it morally and ethically right for the NHL to stop taking millions from the city? Hell, hundreds of millions. And from a business sense, why would you want to have a break even situation (at best) when you can move it to Canada and make millions each year instead?
|
a) There's no moral issue here. The city of Glendale is making the decisions that it deems are best for its citizens, the NHL has no role in that process.
b) I'm not privy to NHL board meetings, but I suspect that a board made up of highly decorated businessmen who have made themselves, and their shareholders, hundreds of billions of dollars collectively are capable of evaluating what the best business decision is. Perhaps the situation isn't as simple as you've attempted to make it out to be?