Quote:
Originally Posted by Kev
No, but I've seen enough to make me believe there is some, if not a lot of truth there. Scientific evidence doesn't just happen, it needs a starting point.
I guess I'll have to try it myself. And as much as that would fall under anecdotal evidence, there would be no more powerful evidence than that for me. Kind of ironic really.
|
I have relatives who use that as proof of the existence of God. Invalid causal connections by correllating coincidences with personal biases and assumptions.
If we used that as our yardstick for scientific proof, then I could make any claim I wanted to, and as long as it worked for me, I could claim it to be so. Thankfully, science doesn't work like that.