View Single Post
Old 04-19-2012, 10:35 AM   #2797
First Lady
First Line Centre
 
First Lady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov View Post
Haha. So it is an "honour killing", and motivated by "bigoted views", simply because the accused was a muslim. That's rich. For the record, I just read that article, and the Court of Queen's Bench decision, as well as the Alberta Court of Appeal decision which overturned the trial judge's decision and ordered a new trial, and there is absolutley no indication whatsoever that this particular crime was motivated by bigoted religious views.

In any event, there was clearly public outrage of the length of the sentence, and the decision has been overturned. All in all, this was not a good example of society's tolerance of intolerance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Its amusing (in a sad way) that you're wondering where the "outrage" was and the first word of the article about this is "outrage". I suppose that answers the question?
Just for clarity ~~ since you both quoted me....

I have not claimed it was an honor killing, nor have I denied there was outrage. I simply posted a link in response to someone asking what the other poster was referring to.
First Lady is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to First Lady For This Useful Post: