Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis
The quote is from the article in the Globe and Mail. I haven't read the "rules" but if there's a behavior clause in there, then while censoring free speech isn't implicitly in writing, its implied because of the broad nature of a behavior rule. Speaking out to the detriment of the party would no doubt be considered breaking the behavior rule.
|
Here are the
rules
Here is a more balanced
article on the issue
Again I will point out two facts.
1) all candidates running have
already been reimbursed their bonds.
2) there are 55 people who ran as nominee candidates, who haven't had bonds refunded. You can confirm that figure
here. Listed under liabilities "performance bonds"
And for a real life example, my husband is subject to it.
See his
blog or follow him on
Twitter.
He's also done 3 or 4
interviews with Sun News
Doesn't seem too gagged to me.