View Single Post
Old 04-13-2012, 03:42 PM   #417
valo403
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Senator Clay Davis View Post
But the husband isn't expressing the views. Another lawyer from his firm is. Its a somewhat indirect conflict of interest, but I'm guessing if this wasn't the new "Trial of the Century" she probably wouldn't have offered to recuse herself.
She may have. The point of an offer to recuse is to put everything on the table, it's not excuse making or ducking out of a trial because you don't want to handle it. You're painting it as if she did this out of some sort of self interest when that is simply not how recusals work.
valo403 is offline   Reply With Quote