Quote:
Originally Posted by sworkhard
Outright denying service is the extreme end of conscience rights and likely beyond the rights proposed by the wild rose. In all likely hood it would be something closer to this. "You have the right to not perform a service so long as you can make alternative arrangements for the person requesting the service, can do so in a timely fashion, and a small delay in providing the service won't cause any harm." Writing this up to be specific enough to not be exploited would be extremely difficult of course, but its likely what is intended when the wild rose talks about conscience rights. This is all speculation of course, but it's approximately what I'd expect.
|
I don't buy that. Would a doctor who objects to abortion not have the same objections to referring someone for one? It's only logical that they would.