Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Waste of time. You've clearly already dismissed the alternative hypotheses before even looking into them. The fact you've taken the "Earth is warming" as a definite conclusion says enough.
I believe that human induced global warming is probably happening and that, regardless, we should take steps to reduce carbon use. Am I open to new ideas? Absolutely. Should we be encouraging freedom of thought on the issue? Absolutely.
You've taken my stance on discussion of the issue and decided: "I'm not supporting your view 100%, so therefore I'm part of the problem."
Once again, it's not the content of the AGW crowd I disagree with, it's their methods and the hijacking of the scientific process. If you really just want your guy to win the next election just say so.
|
You're right, it is a waste of time. Because there's no other theories that hold up to scrutiny.
The Earth warming is an indisputable fact over the past 120 years.
I've taken your stance as agnostic to which I've replied well show me why you could be agnostic because there's certainly no evidence to support it.