Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Couldn't you make the same conclusions about non-conservaties as well. Don't you think that the more likely situation is that there are several competing scientific theories to the effects of global warming and the cause of these effects.
This article states:
Alternative theories are also based on science. Personally, I think the AGW theory is the most likely, and even if it isn't correct we should push towards renewable resources as quickly as possible for many many reasons. However, to make a statement that essentially boils down to: "anyone who educates themselves on alternate theories is stupid" is wrong for so many reasons.
The fact this issue has been totally consumed by politics is sad.
|
There are no other competing theories that have any actually rigour, evidence to support them and subsequent merit. The fact that you even mention this is further proof positive that you don't understand the base facts of this issue.