View Single Post
Old 03-21-2012, 10:10 PM   #1519
VANFLAMESFAN
Franchise Player
 
VANFLAMESFAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matata View Post
Now that Shane is dead, I can explain how badly they dropped the ball with Carl and Ricks characters.

*comics spoiler*

Spoiler!
This is why reading sucks. Kidding of course, but a part of me gets frustrated that when a show/movie that is based on a book/comics etc has something different, the immediate reaction is that the adaptation is worse than the source material.

In the credits, it clearly says "based on the series of graphic novels", it doesn't say "a word for word adaptation of the graphic novel". There's nothing wrong with changing it up a bit. Why can't the writers put their own spin on this story without being ripped to shreds for it?

Now I haven't read the comics so I can't comment what was better or worse or whatever, but this isolated analysis of the characters is not what I have issue with. It's the overall notion that way more often than not that if a tv show or movie strays away fromt the source material a bit, they automatically dropped the ball. I vehemently disagree with that notion.

Last edited by VANFLAMESFAN; 03-21-2012 at 10:13 PM.
VANFLAMESFAN is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to VANFLAMESFAN For This Useful Post: