Quote:
Originally Posted by GP_Matt
I would love to see a system that bases their pension on how well they stuck to their election promises. Maybe they go before a tribunal when they retire and layout their campaign literature and election interviews and then state what they did to accomplish their promises. The committee can then decide what percentage of their pension they should receive. A system that holds them to their promises would go a long way to attracting quality people and I wouldn't mind paying them what they are worth.
|
Oh man, that's the kind of judgement system that would swamp courts and waste even more taxpayer money. You'd have to have some serious metrics systems in place to make that effective, and even then, alot of it would be arbitrary. Would a statistical number be sufficient or a qualitative assessment? There is some grey areas on that one.