[squiggs96]

What I didn't understand about giving up immunity, was they eliminated Bill. Tarzan comes flying in from the water and says they have a traitor, belittles Leif in front of everyone and says they'll give up immunity to get rid of him. I know it was Colton's plan to get rid of Bill, but why would everyone agree to vote out Bill at that point, since he was the next to go.

If Leif felt so threatened, why wouldn't he have switched alliances to go four on four against Colton's posse? Those four could have said no to giving up immunity, let the girls go to tribal and dealt with the four on four the next time they lost.

I've watched a lot of Survivor, and no good has ever come of losing a challenge to get rid of someone or this. It wouldn't matter if I was on Survivor with Burrows, if I had the numbers we try and win every time. The other side gets weaker, physically, emotionally and in numbers. When we do lose, we get rid of him then. Colton has the idol, so it's not like another day gives Bill another day to find one.

The whole thought process seems lacking in common sense. Colton is a complete waste of skin. I couldn't believe he was giving Bill crap because he was poor. Bill was fine with being poor, and wasn't asking Colton for a handout, so why would it matter? If Colton wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth, maybe he'd have a different point of view, but it's just weird seeing a guy accost someone like that for not having money.