View Single Post
Old 03-01-2012, 05:22 PM   #102
longsuffering
First Line Centre
 
longsuffering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady View Post
How/why would the topic of the calls change my position on this? What are you trying to suggest?



Agreed and RackNine didn't plan, approve, fund and/or commit the criminal act.
I guess I wasn't clear. Let me try again.

If I understand you correctly, you would feel that Racknine would have no responsibility, not even a moral one, if their system was used to make thousands or tens of thousands of anti-gay or anti-Semitic calls to Canadians.

If I understand you correctly, I understand that you're fine with them closing their eyes to any abuse of their service.

Secondly, I didn't mean to suggest that Racknine was criminally responsible for planning or initiating the robocalls. My intention was to say that the blame for the fiasco shouldn't lay with some Conservative party lowly staffer. The investigation will have to identify those, even if they occupy senior positions in the Party, who planned, funded and approved the campaign. THOSE individuals, not an intern following orders, are the ones who should face any legal repercussions.


I guess you didn't have time to address my rebuttal to your analogies.
longsuffering is offline   Reply With Quote