View Single Post
Old 03-01-2012, 10:19 AM   #73
c.t.ner
First Line Centre
 
c.t.ner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary in Heart, Ottawa in Body
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rathji View Post
I think considering it at all just serves to distract from the serious offense here.

Calling someone during dinner time being considered in the same breath as a massive campaign of voter disinformation? That's like trying to convict a guy for murdering a store clerk but taking up the courts time to also try him for stealing a chocolate bar on the way out the door. At some point it really becomes irrelevant.
I agree that there are various levels of seriousness in regards to all the Robocall claims that are surfacing. The voter suppression calls are clearly the most important and then there are various levels of issues with the other Robocalls.

But any allegation of impersonating members from a campaign and purposely making targeted calls to irritate campaign's voters or supporter is a serious claim that should also be investigated. Let's say for what ever reason the issues in Guelph are unrelated to the other Robocall allegation, I personally don't think those should be ignored. In the end it only goes to further belittle the whole campaign process.
c.t.ner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to c.t.ner For This Useful Post: