Quote:
Originally Posted by Sliver
That's the same exact argument gun nuts use in spite of the fact that fewer guns directly correlate to fewer gun deaths.
Not to mention you're using the argument that dogs are great at being violent towards people in an argument where people are trying to show dogs aren't violent towards people.
|
Well of course if there were no Dogs around no one would ever be hurt by a dog. That isn't the point, the point is that it would need to be weighed against how many people are protected by their dogs. I am saying I don't know the answer because I have not seen any stats on that. I assume that your position is just a guess at what you think is the correct answer? I also won't be bothered to look up the stats on that because I both don't have a dog nor children.