Quote:
Originally Posted by zuluking
As this is likely addressed to my post, I'll respond. Nowhere am I offended on behalf of someone. I was more interested to see who would retract / update their insinuation / accusations / conjecture in light of some real facts... the folks adamant that their criminal psychology knowledge had readily identified the husband as the perpetrator.
|
Who was adamant that the husband was the perpetrator?
I saw people saying that in cases like this it is very likely that it was the husband but having followed this thread I didn't see anyone say that it was him for sure or really say anything other than in most cases like this that it is the husband.
The fact that the husband is still the most likely person in cases like this, even though it appears he had nothing to do with it here, hasn't changed.
Why should anyone take what they said?
Unless I missed something there was nothing in particular about this husband that was pointed out and just generalities about this type of case.